idk why introverts have a reputation of being quiet and shy people who’d rather be alone. have you ever been friends with an introvert who’s decided you’re worth their time? we turn into the clingiest, most needy pieces of shit on the planet because there’s so few people we actually can stand
That’s exactly what all the people should know.
YO SO I HEARD ENCHANTED PLAYING DOWN THE HALLWAY RIGHT????? SO I WALKED DOWN THERE AND SAW THAT THE GIRLS IN THE ROOM WERE LISTENING TO IT AND I WAS LIKE “DO WE HAVE SWIFTIES IN HERE?” AND THEY WERE LIKE “HELL YEAH THIS IS THE T-SWIFT PARTY STATION!” AND WE FANGIRLED AND I’M JUST AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!!!!
DUDE BUT LIKE WHAT GETS ME IS THE LINE
**REMEMBER WHEN WE COULDN’T TAKE THE HEAT, I WALKED OUT, I SAID “IM SETTING YOU FREE”**
ALL THE FEELS RIGHT THERE. I FEEL IT. HELP ME IM FEELING.
BABY IM SO SORRY.
The “I’m setting you free” line hurts so much. It shows that either she thought that he thought the relationship was a burden, or that he made it known that it was a burden. Either way it just hurts.
Hey taylorswift remember me? I tried to get you to take a shot with me, but you thought I meant a Polaroid
THIS IS HOW THE BRITISH PRESS RESPONDS TO THE KILLINGS OF DISABLED CHILDREN. All of these extracts were taken from UK news websites. the final tweet is in response to a now-deleted tweet from politician Sandy Kaylan, who praised a mother for ‘euthanising’ her infant children
tania Clarence, 43, admitted to smothering three of her children, all of whom suffered from physical disabilities. Regardless of the circumstances that led to their tragic deaths, these methods of reporting are unethical and go against the British editors code of practice - which states that, once proceedings are active, the press cannot publish any material that could create substantial risk of prejudice in court. The language used in these articles (“tragic mum”, “the unbearable burden of care”, putting the word murder in scare quotes, etc) does exactly that. Reading these articles, it is clear who we are meant to “side” with.
that these rules on court proceedings are apparently not applicable to cases involving the killing of disabled children shows how little the British press (and by extension, the public) cares about the welfare of disabled people in this country. Calling these children burdens and implying they deserved to die reinforces ableism and makes the world a more dangerous place for disabled people. Yet the press does not count it as encouraging prejudice. maybe it’s because we believe the unlawful killing of disabled infants does not “count” as a real crime
This is abhorrent.
5,000 notes. Tumblr really that’s it?
People are surprised that this only had 5000 notes? That’s pretty much a standard problem. Tumblr as a whole tends to not really give a shit about ableism. I mean this might not be the case for smaller communities like the autistic community or the mentally ill communities etc, but yeah, I’m very much unsurprised at the lack of notes. That’s pretty standard.
After all, tumblr circulated a petition to make a death star but didn’t really circulate one that advocated for it to be illegal to prevent a disabled person from receiving an organ transplant.
But you know. What do I know?
So I was out buying halloween decorations and I saw this wig, picked it up and then I saw it…..
WHAT IN THE WORLD?!?!?
WHY IS JENSEN’S FACE ON IT?!
Ah you’re watching Orphan Black?? I love that show. The way Tatiana just [clenches fist] plays all those fricking characters
So every time the coach blew the whistle on the bus, Scott, Isaac, Boyd and Ethan—We all inhaled it.
Allison: You were all poisoned by it.